Progress

What every band number is built on. Click any subject for the full attempt history and the agent's reasoning.

11
Essays scored
26h 14m
Platform time
+6
Average band lift · 14d

Property

−2 · 14d
43 Fail risk · cliff edge
Why so low. Two of three Property essays scored 39 and 41 (range-band fail). The 1994 Act section citation pattern is missing on every attempt; the agent has scheduled three Property blocks this week including Wednesday's Webb essay.
3 essays · 1 Webb pending Practice now →

Equity

±0 · 14d
51 Pass · borderline
Stable but flat. Two essays in band 50-53. The agent is scheduling one Equity simulation per week to push the closed-book muscle memory; injunctions and trusts are the two weakest sub-topics.
2 essays · sim Wed Open sim →

EU Law

+3 · 14d
54 Pass · climbing
Trending up. Direct effect and supremacy attempts both crossed 55 this fortnight. Hold pattern at one essay per week.
2 essays · 1 scheduled Thu Practice →

Tort

+5 · 14d
67 Merit · solid
Strong subject. Maintaining at 65-68 across the last fortnight. Plan slot dropped to short 20-min case-law drills to free time for Property.
What is driving each band

The model decomposes each prediction into the three signals that moved it the most. Negative impacts in red, lifts in green.

Property No section citation on the 1994 Act in any attempt −6
Property Webb v Ireland ratio not quoted, only paraphrased −3
Property Hot-topic match: adverse possession in 8 of last 10 sittings, attempted 0 times −4
Equity Mareva framework cited correctly but no Z Ltd v A-Z case −2
Tort Hunter v Canary Wharf cited with ratio · model answer match +4
EU Direct effect: Van Gend en Loos + Costa v ENEL both quoted +3
How predictions are made

Each subject band is the model's estimate of what you would score if you sat the next paper today. It is built from:

  • Recent essay bands — weighted toward the most recent three attempts.
  • Citation accuracy — green dots vs missing or flagged authorities.
  • IRAC structure — coach's per-paragraph tags collapsed into a structure score.
  • Topic coverage — gaps in your attempt history against past-paper frequency.

No black box. Every band number is auditable in this view.